Weapons of math destruction, are mathematical models or algorithms that claim to quantify important traits: teacher quality, recidivism risk, creditworthiness but have harmful outcomes and often reinforce inequality, keeping the poor poor and the rich rich. They have three things in common: opacity, scale, and damage. They are often proprietary or otherwise shielded from prying eyes, so they have the effect of being a black box. They affect large numbers of people, increasing the chances that they get it wrong for some of them. And they have a negative effect on people, perhaps by encoding racism or other biases into an algorithm or enabling predatory companies to advertise selectively to vulnerable people, or even by causing a global financial crisis. But as the book suggest the mathematics of big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. More here and at http://amzn.to/2clQHXG
Monday, 26 February 2018
Thursday, 22 February 2018
Media: the least trusted institution globally, according to a new study
For the first time media is the least
trusted institution globally. In 22 of the 28 markets surveyed it is now
distrusted. The demise of confidence in the Fourth Estate is driven primarily
by a significant drop in trust in platforms, notably search engines and social
media. Sixty-three percent of respondents say they do not know how to tell good
journalism from rumor or falsehoods or if a piece of news was produced by a
respected media organization. The lack of faith in media has also led to an
inability to identify the truth (59 percent), trust government leaders (56
percent) and trust business (42 percent). For more see Edelman TrustBarometer .
Labels:
Business and Society
Sunday, 17 April 2016
There Is No Such Thing as a Green Product ?
Authors Trevor Zink and Roland Geyer suggest that here is no such thing as a “green” product. The corporate sustainability gospel—that green companies
sell green products, and green products have some absolute and well-defined
environmental attributes—evaporates on closer inspection. According to the authors the environmental benefits of green products
are not that they somehow fix the environment or have zero impact, but rather
that their environmental impacts are less than those of similar products.
Products can have an impact on the environment during one or more stages of
their life cycles, which are production, use, and end of life. A natural step is therefore
to tally up the environmental impacts of similar products throughout their life cycles
and compare the results. Read more at SSIR here .
Wednesday, 6 April 2016
Economics, in the last decades, has been harmful for most people?
As
Chang had put it in Guardian: “Economics,
as it has been practised in the last three decades, has been positively harmful
for most people.” !! “Economists are not some innocent technicians who did a
decent job within the narrow confines of their expertise until they were
collectively wrong-footed by a once-in-a-century disaster that no one could
have predicted.” Far from being an inward-looking, hermetic discipline,
economics has been a hugely powerful – and profitable – enterprise, shaping the
policies of governments and companies throughout much of the world. The results
have been little short of disastrous” . A great book, a must read, for all
thought leaders. Ha-Joon Chang, Prof at the University of Cambridge, is
one of the leading heterodox economists and institutional economists
specialising in development economics .
A Professor at Cambridge that is analytically debunking the myths
of capitalism in his book “23 Things They Don’t Tell You About Capitalism”. A must read.
See more here.
Friday, 1 April 2016
Monsanto: Strong Ties, Strong Media and the challenge of editorial integrity and independence
According to Huffpost , the media and partnerships division of the venerable magazine Scientific American hosted
a panel Thursday at the National Press Club featuring journalists and
scientists. The event, cosponsored by a group called GMO Answers,
focuses on whether science is “explained fairly in the media.” What
might be less apparent is that GMO Answers requires some explanation
itself: The group is a project of agricultural biotech firms meant to
buttress the industry’s reputation.
GMO Answers, which was launched in
the summer of 2013 to help improve the impression of genetically
modified foods in the U.S., is a project of PR giant Ketchum. Funding
for the effort comes from agricultural biotech companies, including
Monsanto and Syngenta. Monsanto, which sells seeds that have been genetically altered so crops can survive the company’s glyphosate weedkiller, was facing pressure in many states to label foods containing GMOs, or genetically modified organisms. GMO Answers was created as a website where people could have questions answered by supposedly “independent” scientists.
The New York Times reported in 2013 that GMO Answers would embrace a more “transparent” approach in addressing critics, who accuse big agricultural companies of “purposely hiding information.” Around the same time, Politico reported that Monsanto shook up its internal PR shop and began a “charm offensive,” visiting newsrooms across Washington.
Labels:
Business and Society,
Ethics
Wednesday, 30 March 2016
Nestle in Society: Creating Shared Value (CSV)
The 2015 report focuses on the 39 commitments that range across the Creating Shared Value (CSV) focus areas of nutrition, health and wellness; water and environmental sustainability; rural development, human rights, and people, to provide the reader an overview of Nestlé’s material issues and activities in these areas. Nestlé’s societal commitments, first published in 2012, were developed in consultation with external stakeholders and provide the reader with a clear sense of the strategic direction and standards of the company. A more detailed version of the reportis also available on the company’s CSV page.
Friday, 4 March 2016
Why organizations must look beyond corporate-social-responsibility initiatives to truly engage
Antibusiness sentiment is nothing new. Yet mending the rift between big business and society isn’t merely a worthy goal—it may represent a new frontier of competitive advantage, profitability, and longevity for today’s organizations. In Connect: How companies succeed by engaging radically with society (PublicAffairs, March 2016), L1 Energy chairman and former BP chief executive officer John Browne, McKinsey’s Robin Nuttall, and entrepreneur Tommy Stadlen offer a practical blueprint for reconciling companies and communities. Read more about this topic from McKinsey here .
Tuesday, 1 March 2016
Applying circular-economy principles
Plastics are the workhorse material of the modern
economy. Their popularity has kept the industry growing for 50 years,
with global production surging from 15 million metric tons in 1964 to
311 million metric tons in 2014. If business proceeds as usual, this
number is projected to double to more than 600 million metric tons in
the next 20 years. Read the full story from this McKinsey article here .
Labels:
Environment
Wednesday, 10 December 2014
Can Energy Competitiveness Drive Europe’s Future Growth?
This was the main theme of a Policy Dialogue event organized in January 2014 at the European Parliament (Brussels) that I was invited to give a presentation, focusing on two of the main pillars of Europe’s industrial competitiveness. European companies’ competitiveness is under pressure due to higher energy costs and costs related to the adaptation to increasingly demanding environmental challenges and regulations. The proper mix of an industrial policy to tackle these challenges is of great importance for every country and also for Europe as a whole. This MEP Policy Dialogue is providing a platform where policy issues related to energy and environment affecting industrial competitiveness in the EU, can be openly discussed and debated with decision makers and all stakeholders. For the presentation, click here .
Labels:
Competitiveness
Monday, 9 December 2013
Strategy for Good: Inspiration and advice for young social entrepreneurs
The goal of the initiative, called “Strategy for Good”, is
to make it easier to young social entrepreneurs to develop a strategy and produce an effective business plan, through a
mentoring program, at no cost to all selected applicants.
The initiative that was
launched by the Costas Kataras Organisation , supports young social entrepreneurs - involved
in the marriage of good business principles with the desire to solve social
problems, improve the environment, and empower communities- that need advice and
/ or mentoring in order to develop
proper Strategy and/or Business Plans. Applicants could send email to:
info@costaskataras.org
Wednesday, 30 October 2013
Shareholder value as an excuse to dodge taxes?
At first glance, you would think that the CEOs of taxophobic U.S. corporations and our less-than-stellar leaders in Washington have nothing in common. But you'd be wrong. What they share is a lack of shame and an excess of narrow thinking, says FORTUNE. Read more here.
Labels:
Leadership
Crafting powerful strategies, the McKinsey way
The essence of strategy is making wise choices about where and how to compete. In this series, McKinsey examines the dynamics of crafting powerful strategies and mobilizing resources to make them happen. The leading strategy consulting firm explains how strategic thought has evolved and where it is headed. Read the series at McKinsey.
Labels:
Leadership
Sunday, 6 October 2013
How EU leaders can reinstate democracy and a debt- free Europe
Perhaps the main reason for the current economic crisis is
that bankers, starting first in the US with its arrogant and greedy capitalism, took control
also in Europe of the real power and decision making from the society
and the politicians, establishing the financial tyranny of our times. As a result, the social construct of Europe , its welfare system and living
standards all collapsed .
How society could take again control and EU leaders to
reinstating democracy, justice and equality in Europe?
The answer is very simple : bankers and all financial
transactions should be subject to a fair VAT tax for all their business. If a
10% VAT is applied as a Financial Transaction Tax (FTT), all the debt of the EU will be erased from the revenues of this tax in just 12 months!!
Look in three simple calculations how this works, based on
analysis and data provide by the Costas Kataras Organisation (www.costaskataras.org )
# EU GDP : 13 trillions
# Financial Transactions (FT) in EU: 700% of EU GDP or 100
trillions
# 100 trillions in FT
X 10% VAT = 10 trillions
The EU total debt is at 85% of
GDP or 10 trillions and could be erased in almost one year !!
When a small farmer in Catalonia and a souvlaki restaurant
in Crete pays VAT at 15% to 25% levels,
its only fair for the bankers to pay
their share . Besides, as studies suggest, this creates a more equal and healthier society, for the long
term benefit of all. Including arrogant
bankers and greedy hedge funds managers.
( The possible argument that financial transactions are “investments”
and not products/ services has been further weakened after the economic crisis, and it is not even worthy of a detailed analysis and debate.)
Labels:
Economics/Politics
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)












